One of the best predictors of a man's income at age 50 is his
height - at the age of 1.
Research published in today's edition of the Archives of Disease
in Childhood found that baby boys who were undersized at 12 months,
grew up to be smaller and less educated and had significantly lower
incomes.
And, surprisingly, the association between height in infancy and
income later in life does not appear to be linked to socio-economic
status.
"Irrespective of social class at birth, men who grow slowly
between birth and one year had lower income in later life," said
David Barker of the environmental epidemiology unit at Southampton
General Hospital in England.
The study does not explain why this is the case, but Dr. Barker
said the most likely explanation is that slow physical growth might
be accompanied by slow brain growth. Another possibility is that
infants may be smaller because they are undernourished or often ill,
factors that may lead to less physical activity and sensory
stimulation.
Researchers also said they could not rule out the possibility
that short stature as an adult led to discrimination and fewer
opportunities for good-paying jobs.
More than 4,500 men were studied, all of whom were born in
Helsinki between 1934 and 1944. Health records in Finland are kept
impeccably and can be linked to other government databases, allowing
this kind of research.
The researchers found that infant boys who measured 72
centimetres (28 inches) or less at one year grew up to have the
least education and lowest incomes, while those measuring 80
centimetres (31.5 inches) or more were far more likely to pursue
higher education and find well-paying jobs. Between those points,
the correlation between infant size and adult income held fast.
The research is not the first to demonstrate the link between
childhood size and educational success. A study of children born in
Newcastle-on-Tyne in 1947 found that a strong predictor of IQ at 11
years of age was a child's height at 3. The taller children
performed better in tests of reasoning, English and arithmetic, and
went on to do better in school and to have higher incomes.
A number of studies have also shown tall men to have all manner
of advantages. They marry sooner, are promoted more quickly, have
higher incomes, and find more success in politics. For example, only
three U.S. presidents have been below-average height. And a U.S.
study showed that, during a 30-year career, a 5-foot-5 worker earns
$160,000 less than his six-foot counterpart, which translates into
about $800 an inch more annually for the taller worker.